It has been a record-breaking year for inflows to funds labelled as ‘ESG’, namely those focused on environmental, social, and governance issues.
By some estimates, investment in these funds has increased ten fold over the past year. Yet there is also growing skepticism. Two separate research papers in the last year have highlighted the disagreement among ESG rating providers, one noting that the average correlation was 54%, the other, 46%. Differences in criteria (what counts as E or S or G), scope (how much of it counts), and weight (how important each factor is) mean that raters only agree about half the time. By contrast, the correlation among credit rating agencies is about 99%. It is not hard to see the problems that cou...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes