Shareholders based in locations that have been recently hit by climate-related disasters are “far more likely” to support environmental proposals, according to a study by Drexel University and the Rotterdam School of Management.
Funds in areas hit by a hurricane, or in hurricane-prone locations, were as much as 38% more likely to vote for eco-initiatives compared to areas that were not, the study found. Researchers Guosong Xu and Eliezer Fich speculate that such a lack of voting support is driven by stockholders' perception that climate-change is not an immediate concern. Xu said: "Climate change related proposals have increased steadily in recent years, reflecting growing investor demand for corporate accountability. However, despite their popularity, these proposals commonly receive insufficient support." ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes